Knowledge base
5 mins
What's the Difference Between Block Subsidy and Block Reward?

The world of cryptocurrencies has been a point of intrigue for many, both seasoned financial experts and curious onlookers.


Among the many terminologies and concepts inherent to this world, two terms that often arise are "block subsidy" and "block reward." These two concepts, while seemingly interchangeable, have distinct implications for the functioning and security of cryptocurrency networks. In this article, we will delve into these terms, their distinctions, and their significance in the broader cryptocurrency framework.

Understanding Block Rewards

At the heart of every cryptocurrency lies the blockchain, a decentralized ledger that records all transactions. Essential to the health and growth of this blockchain are miners or validators, who verify and add new transactions to the ledger. As compensation for their efforts, they receive what is termed a "block reward."

The block reward is multifaceted. It comprises two main components: a block subsidy and transaction fees. The block subsidy is a set amount of newly minted cryptocurrency coins given to miners/validators. It's a reward for their efforts and serves as a mechanism to introduce new coins into circulation. Additionally, transaction fees are amounts attached to each transaction, serving as a further incentive for miners and validators to add transactions to the blockchain.

While both components contribute to the overall block reward, it's the nuanced relationship and balance between them that ensure the stability and growth of a cryptocurrency network.

Diving Deeper into Block Subsidy

The block subsidy is the primary component of the block reward and is often what most people refer to when discussing mining rewards.

Defined, the block subsidy is the number of newly minted coins awarded to miners/validators for each block they produce. Its amount is predetermined by the cryptocurrency's source code and may undergo periodic changes, such as "halvings" in Bitcoin, or developer-driven hard forks in Ethereum. The coinbase transaction, a unique feature in every block, is the conduit through which the block subsidy is dispensed.

The block subsidy is also a tool ensuring the controlled introduction of new coins, helping manage potential inflation and maintaining the cryptocurrency's value.

Transaction Fees Explained

In addition to the block subsidy, miners/validators receive transaction fees, which are small amounts attached to each transaction processed in a block.

These fees are an incentive for miners/validators to include a transaction in a block and as more transactions vie for inclusion in a block, the competition amongst them can drive up these fees. Over time, as block subsidies decrease, these transaction fees become increasingly significant. They start forming a larger portion of the overall block reward, ensuring that miners/validators remain incentivized even as block subsidies wane.

Transaction fees, thus, are not just an additional bonus for miners but a vital component that ensures the long-term security and sustainability of a cryptocurrency network.

Different cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, have unique mechanisms and structures for their block rewards.

Bitcoin, for instance, employs a halving mechanism where the block subsidy is halved approximately every four years, until all of the 21 million coins are mined in the year 2140 (hard-capped supply). This system ensures a predictable and controlled issuance of new coins.

Ethereum, on the other hand, has undergone significant changes in its consensus mechanism, shifting from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), which has implications for its block reward system. Namely, Ethereum’s supply is not hard-capped, and the block subsidy rewards for validators vary based on the percentage of total coins staked on the network.

Moreover, instead of all of the transaction fees going to the validators (or miners, as they do in Bitcoin), a percentage of them is burned, thereby reducing the circulating supply of Ether. This means that, depending on the current staking activity and transaction volumes, Ethereum’s monetary policy can shift between being inflationary and deflationary.

While the specifics may vary, the underlying principle remains the same: to incentivize miners and validators to secure the network and process transactions.

The Impact of Declining Block Subsidy on Network Security

Bitcoin’s periodic halving of the block subsidy, while crucial for controlled coin issuance, has implications for network security.

As block subsidies reduce, the financial incentives for miners also diminish. This could potentially lead to decreased network security if transaction fees don't adequately compensate for the reduced block subsidies. However, as the block subsidy decreases, the significance of transaction fees increases, ensuring that miners remain incentivized. This delicate balance is essential for maintaining the robustness and security of the network against potential threats.

Thus, the declining block subsidy, while posing challenges, also showcases the adaptive and resilient nature of cryptocurrency networks.


Block rewards, encompassing both block subsidies and transaction fees, play a pivotal role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. They offer financial incentives to miners and validators, ensuring that these individuals are motivated to maintain the network's integrity. The rewards also bolster network security by motivating miners to contribute more computational resources. Additionally, they foster decentralization by allowing diverse participation, ensuring that no single entity gains undue control over the network.

By providing a steady stream of income for miners, block rewards ensure that they have the resources necessary to continue their operations, further enhancing the stability of the network. These rewards also play a crucial role in the rate of new coin issuance, a factor that can influence the cryptocurrency's market value and appeal to investors.

Furthermore, the combination of block subsidies and transaction fees within the block rewards ensures a dynamic and adaptive system. As block subsidies decrease over time, transaction fees gain prominence, creating a self-adjusting mechanism that ensures the long-term viability of the mining profession and the security of the network.

As blockchain technology continues to evolve and find applications beyond just currency, understanding these foundational principles becomes even more crucial. The balance between block subsidies and block rewards is a testament to the forward-thinking nature of cryptocurrency pioneers, ensuring that these decentralized networks remain secure, transparent, and viable for the foreseeable future.